Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment

Military history WikiProject
Main project page + talk News Showcase Style guide Announcements and open tasks  → Articles needing attention  → Popular articles  → New articles talk  → Nominations for deletion talk The Academy talk
Departments Assessment talk  → A-Class FAQ / B-Class FAQ  → Assessment requests Contest talk Logistics talk Review talk  → Review alert box
Project organization Coordinators + talk Members talk  → Active / Inactive  → Banners and userboxes Awards talk Stress hotline talk Portals talk Project banner talk Project category
Templates Infoboxes  → Firearm cartridge talk  → Military award talk  → Military conflict talk  → Military memorial talk  → Military person talk  → Military structure talk  → Military test site talk  → Military unit talk  → National military talk  → War faction talk  → Weapon talk  → Command structure talk  → Operational plan talk  → Service record talk Navigation boxes talk  → Campaignboxes talk Template design style talk
Task forces
General topics Fortifications talk Intelligence talk Maritime warfare talk Military aviation talk Military biography talk Military historiography talk Military land vehicles talk Military memorials and cemeteries talk Military science talk Military technology and engineering talk National militaries talk War films talk Weaponry talk
Nations and regions African military history talk Australian military history talk Balkan military history talk Baltic states military history talk British military history talk Canadian military history talk Chinese military history talk Dutch military history talk French military history talk German military history talk Indian military history talk Italian military history talk Japanese military history talk Korean military history talk Lebanese military history talk Middle Eastern military history talk New Zealand military history talk Nordic military history talk Ottoman military history talk Pakistani military history talk Polish military history talk Romanian military history talk Russian and Soviet military history talk South American military history talk Southeast Asian military history talk Spanish military history talk Taiwanese military history talk United States military history talk
Periods and conflicts Classical warfare talk Medieval warfare talk Early Muslim military history talk Crusades talk Early Modern warfare talk American Revolutionary War talk Napoleonic era talk American Civil War talk World War I talk World War II talk Cold War talk
edit · changes

The assessment department of the Military history WikiProject focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's military history articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the Version 1.0 Editorial Team program.

The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WPMILHIST}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Military history articles by quality, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

[edit] FAQ

See also the general assessment FAQ and the project's B-Class assessment & criteria FAQ and A-Class review & criteria FAQ.

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings? 

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.

2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? 

Just add {{WPMILHIST}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.

3. Someone put a {{WPMILHIST}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? 

Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article).

4. Who can assess articles? 

Any member of the Military history WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.

5. How do I rate an article? 

Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.

6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? 

Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

8. Where can I get more comments about an article? 

The review department can conduct more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for peer review there.

9. What if I don't agree with a rating? 

You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.

10. Aren't the ratings subjective? 

Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

11. What about lists? 

Lists are assessed using the same scale as other articles; however, they progress towards featured list rather than featured article status.

12. Why is C-class not utilized? 

C-class was adopted by the 1.0 Assessment Team in June 2008, but the option of implementing C-class was left to individual projects. An initial decision was made to forgo the use of the class, but a later discussion among our project's contributors generated interest in the class. In March 2009, a referendum on the introduction of C-class failed to show consensus for implementation, which led us to forgo the C-class rating in favor of maintaining the Start/B-class system already in use.

13. What if I have a question not listed here? 

If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page, or contact the project coordinators directly.

14. Does military history have its own stub tag? 

Yes, we have several; see the manual of style for more details.

[edit] Assessment instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WPMILHIST}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):

{{WPMILHIST| ... | class=??? | ...}}

The following values may be used:

• FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class military history articles)
• A (adds articles to Category:A-Class military history articles)
• GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class military history articles)
• B (adds articles to Category:B-Class military history articles)
• Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class military history articles)
• Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class military history articles)
• DAB (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Military history disambiguation pages)

Note that lists are assessed using the same scale as other articles; however, they progress towards featured list rather than featured article status. Also note that C-class is not included on this list, as our project has choosen not to adopt the C-class rating; therefore, all articles within our scope must be assessed either as Start-Class or B-Class.

Pages outside the main namespace (such as portals, images, categories, and user pages) are automatically assigned a class of "NA", indicating that they lie outside the assessment scheme.

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed military history articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

[edit] Quality scale

Class	Criteria	Formal process	Example
FA	Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received featured article status after community review.	Featured article candidates	USS Connecticut (BB-18) (as of February 2009)
A	The article meets the following five criteria: A1. The article is consistently referenced with an appropriate citation style, and all claims are verifiable against reputable sources, accurately represent the relevant body of published knowledge, and are supported with specific evidence and external citations as appropriate. A2. The article is comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral and focused on the main topic; it neglects no major facts or details, presents views fairly and without bias, and does not go into unnecessary detail. A3. The article has an appropriate structure of hierarchical headings, including a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections, and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents. A4. The article is written in concise and articulate English; its prose is clear, is in line with style guidelines, and does not require substantial copy-editing to be fully MoS-compliant. A5. The article contains supporting visual materials, such as images or diagrams with succinct captions, and other media, where appropriate. See also the A-Class review & criteria FAQ.	Military history A-Class review	SM U-66 (as of February 2009)
GA	Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status.	Good article nominations	Japanese battleship Haruna (as of February 2009)
B	The article meets the following five criteria: B1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. B2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. B3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. B4. It is free from major grammatical errors. B5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. See also the B-Class assessment & criteria FAQ.	May be assigned by any reviewer A checklist in {{WPMILHIST}} is used to track the criteria (see the project banner instructions for more details)	Frank Lukis (as of February 2009)
C	C-class was adopted by the 1.0 Assessment Team in June 2008, but the option of implementing C-class was left to individual projects. An initial decision was made to forgo the use of the class, but a later discussion among our project's contributors generated interest in the class. In March 2009, a referendum on the introduction of C-class failed to show consensus for implementation, which led us to forgo the C-class rating in favor of maintaining the Start/B-class system already in use. C-Class is listed here for illustrative purposes only, and should not be used to assess an article within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. The {{WPMILHIST}} template will not display or support the class. All articles must be assessed either as Start-Class or B-Class.
Start	The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element; it has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following: A particularly useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	May be assigned by any reviewer	William L. Waller, Jr. (as of February 2009)
Stub	The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.	May be assigned by any reviewer	Bengal Regiment (as of July 2008)

[edit] Statistics

[edit] Current status

Military history articles		Importance
		None	Total
Quality
	FA	431	431
	A	188	188
	GA	579	579
	B	3912	3912
	Start	45629	45629
	Stub	40697	40697
	Assessed	91436	91436
	Unassessed	11	11
	Total	91447	91447

[edit] Task force statistics

African military history task force assessment statistics African military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 15 15 A 2 2 GA 13 13 B 89 89 Start 672 672 Stub 739 739 Assessed 1530 1530 Total 1530 1530 worklist • log • category	American Civil War task force assessment statistics American Civil War articles Importance None Total Quality FA 12 12 A 13 13 GA 27 27 B 299 299 Start 3792 3792 Stub 2047 2047 Assessed 6190 6190 Total 6190 6190 worklist • log • category	American Revolutionary War task force assessment statistics American Revolutionary War articles Importance None Total Quality FA 8 8 A 5 5 GA 39 39 B 85 85 Start 787 787 Stub 529 529 Assessed 1453 1453 Total 1453 1453 worklist • log • category
Australian military history task force assessment statistics Australian military history articles Importance Top Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 2 38 41 FL 1 1 2 A 3 28 31 GA 1 2 1 22 26 B 2 7 5 166 180 C 1 7 8 Start 7 4 1092 1103 Stub 1 7 979 987 List 12 12 Assessed 4 23 18 2345 2390 Total 4 23 18 2345 2390 worklist • log • category		Balkan military history task force assessment statistics Balkan military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 6 6 A 5 5 GA 13 13 B 67 67 Start 580 580 Stub 419 419 Assessed 1090 1090 Total 1090 1090 worklist • log • category
Baltic states military history task force assessment statistics Baltic states military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 2 2 A 1 1 GA 4 4 B 16 16 Start 159 159 Stub 119 119 Assessed 301 301 Total 301 301 worklist • log • category	British military history task force assessment statistics British military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 107 107 A 20 20 GA 151 151 B 692 692 Start 7417 7417 Stub 7978 7978 Assessed 16365 16365 Total 16365 16365 worklist • log • category	Canadian military history task force assessment statistics Canadian military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 14 14 A 5 5 GA 22 22 B 72 72 Start 960 960 Stub 1135 1135 Assessed 2208 2208 Total 2208 2208 worklist • log • category
Chinese military history task force assessment statistics Chinese military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 6 6 A 1 1 GA 7 7 B 52 52 Start 695 695 Stub 718 718 Assessed 1479 1479 Total 1479 1479 worklist • log • category	Classical warfare task force assessment statistics Classical warfare articles Importance None Total Quality FA 22 22 A 10 10 GA 26 26 B 113 113 Start 1047 1047 Stub 893 893 Assessed 2111 2111 Total 2111 2111 worklist • log • category
Cold War task force assessment statistics Cold War articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 2 1 2 9 14 A 5 5 GA 1 4 3 5 14 27 B 3 15 14 8 121 161 C 1 1 3 2 7 14 Start 7 26 15 321 369 Stub 1 13 190 204 List 1 1 Assessed 7 27 48 45 668 795 Unassessed 1 1 1 253 256 Total 8 28 49 45 921 1051 worklist • log • category		Crusades task force assessment statistics Crusades articles Importance None Total Quality FA 3 3 GA 2 2 B 25 25 Start 165 165 Stub 76 76 Assessed 271 271 Total 271 271 worklist • log • category
Dutch military history task force assessment statistics Dutch military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 5 5 A 2 2 GA 9 9 B 44 44 Start 330 330 Stub 248 248 Assessed 638 638 Total 638 638 worklist • log • category	Early Modern warfare task force assessment statistics Early Modern warfare articles Importance None Total Quality FA 23 23 A 9 9 GA 54 54 B 172 172 Start 1747 1747 Stub 1381 1381 Assessed 3386 3386 Total 3386 3386 worklist • log • category	Early Muslim military history task force assessment statistics Early Muslim military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 2 2 A 4 4 GA 12 12 B 31 31 Start 125 125 Stub 59 59 Assessed 233 233 Total 233 233 worklist • log • category
Fortifications task force assessment statistics Fortifications articles Importance None Total Quality FA 5 5 A 2 2 GA 24 24 B 52 52 Start 981 981 Stub 1573 1573 Assessed 2637 2637 Total 2637 2637 worklist • log • category	French military history task force assessment statistics French military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 34 34 A 10 10 GA 44 44 B 186 186 Start 2013 2013 Stub 1818 1818 Assessed 4105 4105 Total 4105 4105 worklist • log • category	German military history task force assessment statistics German military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 49 49 A 30 30 GA 53 53 B 423 423 Start 3068 3068 Stub 2761 2761 Assessed 6384 6384 Total 6384 6384 worklist • log • category
Indian military history task force assessment statistics Indian military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 4 4 A 2 2 GA 3 3 B 71 71 Start 650 650 Stub 612 612 Assessed 1342 1342 Total 1342 1342 worklist • log • category	Intelligence task force assessment statistics Intelligence articles Importance None Total Quality FA 1 1 GA 1 1 B 30 30 Start 336 336 Stub 171 171 Assessed 539 539 Total 539 539 worklist • log • category	Italian military history task force assessment statistics Italian military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 10 10 GA 6 6 B 61 61 Start 708 708 Stub 457 457 Assessed 1242 1242 Total 1242 1242 worklist • log • category
Japanese military history task force assessment statistics Japanese military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 32 32 A 10 10 GA 13 13 B 198 198 Start 1765 1765 Stub 1292 1292 Assessed 3310 3310 Total 3310 3310 worklist • log • category	Korean military history task force assessment statistics Korean military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 1 1 B 27 27 Start 310 310 Stub 212 212 Assessed 550 550 Total 550 550 worklist • log • category	Lebanese military history task force assessment statistics Lebanese military history articles Importance None Total Quality B 19 19 Start 24 24 Stub 7 7 Assessed 50 50 Total 50 50 worklist • log • category
Maritime warfare task force assessment statistics Maritime warfare articles Importance None Total Quality FA 103 103 A 41 41 GA 180 180 B 775 775 Start 12264 12264 Stub 9652 9652 Assessed 23015 23015 Total 23015 23015 worklist • log • category	Medieval warfare task force assessment statistics Medieval warfare articles Importance None Total Quality FA 35 35 A 9 9 GA 41 41 B 140 140 Start 1472 1472 Stub 1150 1150 Assessed 2847 2847 Total 2847 2847 worklist • log • category	Middle Eastern military history task force assessment statistics Middle Eastern military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 9 9 A 4 4 GA 7 7 B 143 143 Start 792 792 Stub 718 718 Assessed 1673 1673 Total 1673 1673 worklist • log • category
Military aviation task force assessment statistics Military aviation articles Importance None Total Quality FA 35 35 A 30 30 GA 41 41 B 614 614 Start 6784 6784 Stub 3993 3993 Assessed 11497 11497 Total 11497 11497 worklist • log • category	Military biography task force assessment statistics Biography (military) articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 4 11 2 85 102 FL 10 10 A 2 3 11 16 GA 3 8 17 20 109 157 B 8 39 91 114 932 1184 C 2 4 16 23 125 170 Start 8 57 429 1697 9869 12060 Stub 3 9 121 883 11431 12447 List 18 18 Assessed 24 121 687 2742 22590 26164 Unassessed 1 2 8 250 261 Total 24 122 689 2750 22840 26425 worklist • log • category
Military historiography task force assessment statistics Military historiography articles Importance None Total Quality A 1 1 GA 4 4 B 25 25 Start 245 245 Stub 181 181 Assessed 456 456 Total 456 456 worklist • log • category	Military land vehicles task force assessment statistics Military land vehicles articles Importance None Total Quality FA 13 13 A 3 3 GA 5 5 B 37 37 Start 451 451 Stub 250 250 Assessed 759 759 Total 759 759 worklist • log • category	Military memorials and cemeteries task force assessment statistics Military memorials and cemeteries articles Importance None Total Quality FA 9 9 A 1 1 GA 6 6 B 31 31 Start 429 429 Stub 231 231 Assessed 707 707 Total 707 707 worklist • log • category
Military science task force assessment statistics Military science articles Importance None Total Quality FA 3 3 A 2 2 GA 5 5 B 36 36 Start 447 447 Stub 339 339 Assessed 832 832 Total 832 832 worklist • log • category	Military technology and engineering task force assessment statistics Military technology and engineering articles Importance None Total Quality FA 38 38 A 17 17 GA 24 24 B 356 356 Start 3726 3726 Stub 3096 3096 Assessed 7257 7257 Total 7257 7257 worklist • log • category	Napoleonic era task force assessment statistics Napoleonic era articles Importance None Total Quality FA 18 18 A 3 3 GA 43 43 B 116 116 Start 920 920 Stub 609 609 Assessed 1709 1709 Total 1709 1709 worklist • log • category
National militaries task force assessment statistics National militaries articles Importance None Total Quality FA 6 6 GA 1 1 B 41 41 Start 640 640 Stub 274 274 Assessed 962 962 Total 962 962 worklist • log • category	New Zealand military history task force assessment statistics New Zealand military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 4 4 A 1 1 GA 2 2 B 28 28 Start 204 204 Stub 177 177 Assessed 416 416 Total 416 416 worklist • log • category	Nordic military history task force assessment statistics Nordic military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 10 10 A 1 1 GA 6 6 B 43 43 Start 746 746 Stub 622 622 Assessed 1428 1428 Total 1428 1428 worklist • log • category
Ottoman military history task force assessment statistics Ottoman military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 2 2 A 2 2 GA 3 3 B 47 47 Start 324 324 Stub 324 324 Assessed 702 702 Total 702 702 worklist • log • category	Pakistani military history task force assessment statistics Pakistani military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 1 1 GA 1 1 B 28 28 Start 196 196 Stub 191 191 Assessed 417 417 Total 417 417 worklist • log • category	Polish military history task force assessment statistics Polish military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 14 14 A 6 6 GA 7 7 B 70 70 Start 607 607 Stub 628 628 Assessed 1332 1332 Total 1332 1332 worklist • log • category
Romanian military history task force assessment statistics Romanian military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 1 1 A 5 5 GA 6 6 B 22 22 Start 176 176 Stub 106 106 Assessed 316 316 Total 316 316 worklist • log • category	Russian and Soviet military history task force assessment statistics Russian and Soviet military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 18 18 A 16 16 GA 12 12 B 138 138 Start 1805 1805 Stub 1428 1428 Assessed 3417 3417 Total 3417 3417 worklist • log • category	South American military history task force assessment statistics South American military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 5 5 GA 4 4 B 28 28 Start 421 421 Stub 441 441 Assessed 899 899 Total 899 899 worklist • log • category
Southeast Asian military history task force assessment statistics Southeast Asian military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 16 16 A 24 24 GA 5 5 B 97 97 Start 721 721 Stub 464 464 Assessed 1327 1327 Total 1327 1327 worklist • log • category	Spanish military history task force assessment statistics Spanish military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 16 16 A 3 3 GA 1 1 B 38 38 Start 480 480 Stub 315 315 Assessed 853 853 Total 853 853 worklist • log • category	Taiwanese military history task force assessment statistics Taiwanese military history articles Importance None Total Quality GA 1 1 B 4 4 Start 80 80 Stub 34 34 Assessed 119 119 Total 119 119 worklist • log • category
United States military history task force assessment statistics United States military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 146 146 A 64 64 GA 222 222 B 1410 1410 Start 19312 19312 Stub 11067 11067 Assessed 32221 32221 Total 32221 32221 worklist • log • category	War films task force assessment statistics War films articles Importance None Total Quality FA 5 5 GA 4 4 B 7 7 Start 259 259 Stub 412 412 List 1 1 Assessed 688 688 Unassessed 1 1 Total 689 689 worklist • log • category	Weaponry task force assessment statistics Weaponry articles Importance None Total Quality FA 33 33 A 15 15 GA 14 14 B 279 279 Start 2923 2923 Stub 2347 2347 Assessed 5611 5611 Total 5611 5611 worklist • log • category
World War I task force assessment statistics World War I articles Importance None Total Quality FA 62 62 A 38 38 GA 147 147 B 525 525 Start 4920 4920 Stub 3932 3932 Assessed 9624 9624 Total 9624 9624 worklist • log • category	World War II task force assessment statistics World War II articles Importance None Total Quality FA 134 134 A 71 71 GA 91 91 B 957 957 Start 11946 11946 Stub 6288 6288 Assessed 19487 19487 Total 19487 19487 worklist • log • category

[edit] Requests for assessment

Please also check Category:Unassessed military history articles for articles needing assessment.

Please note that this section is now a separate, transcluded sub-page, which you might like to watchlist separately. Thanks!

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. Requests for formal A-Class review should be made at the review department. B-Class requests are assessed using the five B-class criteria^(FAQ). Please consider entering articles you have worked on in the military history article writing contest.

• John Ernsting Appeared at the Biography assessment department and someone at WikiProject Military history had rated it B Class. It's more Start Class. Regards Hekerui (talk) 14:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  • It looks as if it's just Milhist B-class. Biography use a different system to us (which unfortunately doesn't use a detailed 5-point assessment) so it's difficult to see where they thought it fell short.  Roger Davies ^talk 03:40, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• Japanese Indian Ocean raid (1944) - new article, thanks Nick-D (talk) 03:21, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
  • B-class though a picture would be nice.  Roger Davies ^talk 03:40, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• Operation Bribie - rewritten with more references etc, thanks. Anotherclown (talk) 00:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • B class. Good work. — AustralianRupert (talk) 00:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• Japanese ammunition ship Kashino - new article, thanks Nick-D (talk) 09:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Start. Nice work so far, but perhaps a bit more details can found on the ship to make it B class. Anyone else having a second thought after looking at the article and assessing it, feel free to do so. Ominae (talk) 03:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
    • That's pretty much everything I could find, but there does appear to be a little bit more in the Japanese Wikipedia article Nick-D (talk) 08:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
      • I see. Well, maybe some references from a book would be nice if they are found or something. Ominae (talk) 17:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• Hermann Detzner - thanks. Anotherclown (talk) 00:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• Special Operations Task Force - Recently created. No details in since the unit's announced according to the Singaporean defence minister since it hasn't been created yet "officially". Ominae (talk) 02:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Start. Anotherclown (talk) 00:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• South Dakota class battleship (1939) - recently rewritten, assessment needs to be updated. Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 19:07, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Very good work. Well done,  Roger Davies ^talk 08:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• Matt Blunt - I recently added this article to the WikiProject. It has been assessed as B-class by two other WikiProjects, and I would like another user to check it for this WikiProject's B-class creteria. --TommyBoy (talk) 03:15, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Also very good work. Well done,  Roger Davies ^talk 08:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• Battle of Coral-Balmoral - thanks. Anotherclown (talk) 08:08, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  • B class. Good work. — AustralianRupert (talk) 08:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Add new requests above this line

If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please list it for peer review instead.

[edit] Backlogs

Please help to clear any backlogs of unassessed articles in the following categories:

• The current status of Category:Unassessed military history articles = 12 articles unassessed. After they have been assessed by class, they are automatically removed from this category.

• The current status of Category:Military history articles with no associated task force = 5 articles without task forces. After task forces have been assigned, articles are automatically removed from the category.

• The current status of Category:Military history articles with incomplete B-Class checklists = 23,573 articles with incomplete checklists. After the checklists have been completed, articles are automatically removed from the category.

[edit] Log

A full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available; unfortunately, due to its extreme size, it cannot be transcluded directly.