Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shortcuts: WP:IN1 WP:IN1.0

Quality: FA-Class | A Class | GA-Class | B-Class | C-Class | Start-Class | Stub Class | Unassessed Importance: Top | High | Mid | Low | Unknown

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject India! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's India articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WP India}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:India articles by quality and Category:India articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents 1 Frequently asked questions 2 Requesting an assessment 3 Instructions 3.1 Quality scale 3.2 Importance scale 3.3 Importance standards 4 Assessment Team 4.1 New members 5 Example assessments 6 Log 7 Workgroup-level statistics

[edit] Frequently asked questions

How do I add an article to the WikiProject? 

Just add {{WP India}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.

How can I get my article rated? 

Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

Who can assess articles? 

Any member of the India WikiProject is free to add a rating to an article if they wish. However, the Assessment Team (from this department) may overrule the rating of an article if they see fit.

What if I don't agree with a rating given by some other member? 

You can then list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. It is most likely to be assessed by someone from this department.

Aren't the ratings subjective? 

Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

Did the reviewer leave any comments? 

If the reviewer had a left a comment, a link, "(see comments)" will show up on the project banner, that will take you to the sub-page containing the comments.

Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, you may not receive detailed comments in all instances. If this is the case, you might ask the person who assessed the article if you have any particular questions; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

To what extent will the Assessment Dept. give feedback on an article after grading it? 

If you wish, the Assessment Dept. (for WikiProject India) will keep giving feedback until the Assessment Dept. believes that the article in question is at least; slightly above a "B" grade. After reaching this stage, the Assessment Team are likely to recommend that your article be peer-reviewed.

Why peer-review? How does it work? 

The peer review department conduct a more thorough examination (and review) of articles, and their services are best utilised when the Assessment Dept. believes that the article is ready to be analyzed in "an extremely critical way" (prior to being nominated to a GA, A, or FA status article). Of course, you may submit/nominate an article for review at the peer review department at any time you wish.

How can I keep track of changes in article ratings? 

A full log of changes over the past thirty days is available here. If you are just looking for an overview, however, the statistics may be more accessible.

How do this all work? 

See Using the bot and WikiProject Council Guide.

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

[edit] Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department instead. Completed requests are usually placed in the archive .

Please place new requests in the format - # [[article name]] -- ~~~~. New requests may please be added at the bottom of the list. Place requests from here onwards:

1. Department of Business Management, University of Calcutta -- Ritwikbmca - assessed without comments
2. National Games of India -- Vikrantdev - Assessed with comments.--GDibyendu (talk) 17:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
3. Ram Narayan -- Narayan won a Padma Vibhushan for his music, I think his importance with regard to music should be reassessed. Thanks! Hekerui (talk) 16:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC) - Done, reassessed importance for WP India.--GDibyendu (talk) 17:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
4. Asad Ali Khan -- needs (importance) assessment, thanks! Hekerui (talk) 02:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC) --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 08:47, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

   Thanks for assessing, but the music project also has an importance rating in the India template. Thank you! Hekerui (talk) 13:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

   Y Done. Ncmvocalist (talk) 14:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

5. 2008 Mumbai attacks -- It has been nearly a month since this article reached GA-status. Since then, sources and information have been added in a neatly formatted manner. I would like for a reviewer to please see if it has reached A-class status. Thanks! Whaatt^uSpeak_{what iDone} 20:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC) -- Will nominate for FA-status as advised by User:Redtigerxyz Whaatt^uSpeak_{what iDone} 12:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
6. Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Vastu Sangrahalaya --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:02, 2 April 2009 (UTC) - assessed as B with comments.--GDibyendu (talk) 05:20, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
7. Articles under Category:Subdivisions of West Bengal. Probably all will be at the same class as they have similar info.--GDibyendu (talk) 09:09, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
8. Prashant Narayanan -- Anant Singh (talk) 04:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC) --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:20, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
9. Kamboja-Dvaravati_Route Extensive copy edits by a couple users in the past days, maybe ready to upgrade. -- Whoosit (talk) 14:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC) Done C. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
10. Indian Air Force -- I have cleaned up the article significantly. Specially the inline citations. Sumanch (talk) 23:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC) B is the highest, we can give. go for GA or FA. In terms of GA, an easy pass, IMO. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
11. Kundara -- Saralstalin (talk) 05:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC) start: some ref.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
12. 2003 Afro-Asian Games -- Ankitbhatt (talk) 12:08, 2 May 2009 (UTC) with comments --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:56, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
13. James Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie--User:HIS33809DukeofBuckfast: May 21 2009, substantial additions to page- new info, reorganization, expansion of references/sources to include both indian and western scholars so that the page is not just a 1911 EB article any more. large unreferenced sections. The current rating C is good enough. No change. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
14. Indian general election, 2009--Harish89 (talk) 04:52, 26 May 2009 (UTC), completely revamped the article, that contains substantial information, well organized and significantly referenced. assessed B.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
15. Tamil Nadu state assembly election, 2006--Harish89 (talk) 20:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC) C.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
16. Dupatta -- —C45207 | Talk 02:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
17. Chembur -- Prad2609 (talk) 07:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Pradeep no improvement in grade. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
18. National Highway 17 (India) -- Prad2609 (talk) 14:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Pradeep start --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
19. Daivajna -- Gautamgoa1984 01:37,3rd June 2009 no change with comments. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
20. Manbir Singh Chaheru--completely revamped the article, that contains substantial information, well organized and significantly referenced --99.51.223.161 (talk) 07:54, 5 June 2009 (UTC) w/o comments --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
21. Daivajna -- Gautamgoa1984 03:56 pm,5rd June 2009 - No change. Comments added. Kensplanet^T_C 13:59, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
22. Daivajna -- Gautamgoa1984 07:41 am,10^th June 2009 - Please do not renominate again and again w/o significant improvements. Kensplanet^T_C 17:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
23. Konkan Railway -- SBC-YPR (talk) 07:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC) - Asessed w/o comments. Kensplanet^T_C 17:50, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
24. Kudaldeshkar Gaud Brahman-- Gautamgoa1984 12:49 pm,15^th June 2009 - Asessed w/o comments. Kensplanet^T_C 17:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
25. Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose College -- Shivaji Mitra (talk) 06:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:19, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
26. Vidyalankar Institute of Technology -- Shravan.Iyer (talk) 15:32, 22 June 2009 (UTC) with comments--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
27. Gomantak Maratha Samaj-------Gautamgoa1984 (talk) 17:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
28. Wadala Road -- Shravan.Iyer (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2009 (UTC) comments --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
29. Vedha_Muthu_(a.k.a._Velu_Muthu)_Mukandar -- Millennium Sunrise (talk) 04:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
30. Daivajna-------Gautamgoa1984 (talk) 05:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
31. Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code SBC-YPR (talk) 10:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC) with comments. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:21, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
32. Kamal Heer -- Alekzandre (talk) 17:09, 3 July 2009 (UTC)--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
33. Chaturmas-------Gautam 07:04, 6 July 2009 (UTC) --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:58, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
34. Sangtar -- Alekzandre (talk) 18:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC) --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:59, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
35. Dhanurmas-------Gautam 05:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC) --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:59, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WP India}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):

{{WP India| ... | class=??? | importance=??? | ...}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

• FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class India articles)
• A (adds articles to Category:A-Class India articles)
• GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class India articles)
• B (adds articles to Category:B-Class India articles)
• C (adds articles to Category:C-Class India articles)
• Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class India articles)
• Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class India articles)
• NA (for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:Non-article India pages)

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed-Class India articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:

• Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance India articles)
• High (adds articles to Category:High-importance India articles)
• Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance India articles)
• Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance India articles)

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

[edit] Quality scale

Please note that the WikiProject India Assessment Department is in the process of updating the grading scheme, so changes may occur to the criteria and examples - the assessment department apologizes for an inconvenience caused, and endeavours to complete this task as soon as possible. Upon completion of updating, the main member of the assessment department will remove this notice.

Class	Criteria	Formal process	Example
FA	Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received featured article status after community review.	Featured article candidates	Tourette Syndrome (as of July 2007)
FL	Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured lists" status, and meet the current criteria for featured lists.	Featured list candidates	FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives (as of January 2008)
A	Reserved for articles that have received A-class status after review by the assessment department. Such articles are required to be passed as a good article, and are expected to have largely met the featured article criteria, and must be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written; however, they may require some further fine-tuning in certain aspects.	Requests for assessment by the department. NOTE: may need to be a former feature article candidate, prior to the department making a decision on whether to grant an article this grade.	Durian (as of March 2007)
GA	Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status.	Good article nominations	International Space Station (as of February 2007)
B	Commonly the highest article grade that is assigned outside a more formal review process. Satisfies all C-class criteria, but also has a majority of the material needed for a comprehensive article. At minimum, it should also have some references to reliable sources. Nonetheless, it has some gaps or missing elements or references, needs editing for language usage or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR).	May be assigned by any reviewer	Jammu and Kashmir (as of October 2007) has a lot of helpful material but needs more prose content and references.
C	The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article must have a defined structure - this includes a lead section, one or more sections of content, as well as a section dedicated to providing references (to sources of information used). The article should be free from major grammatical errors, and should also contain supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.	May be assigned by any reviewer	Perungavur Rajagopalachari (as of January 2009)
Start	The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including the following: multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article a particularly useful picture or graphic (optional)	May be assigned by any reviewer	Ramayan (2008 TV series) (as of March 2008)
Stub	The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.	May be assigned by any reviewer	Example being updated.
List	Should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately organized. May be assigned by any reviewer only for pages that begin with the name "List of" (like in the example). If an article is felt to be an exception to this rule, a request for assessment by the department must be made in order for it to be allowed.	See criteria.	List of aikidoka (as of June 2007)

[edit] Importance scale

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of India.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status	Template	Meaning of Status
Top	{{Top-Class}}	This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High	{{High-Class}}	This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid	{{Mid-Class}}	This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low	{{Low-Class}}	This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None	None	This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

[edit] Importance standards

• States - Generally classed as top importance.
• Capital cities - Generally classed as top to high importance.
• National Parks - Generally classed an high to mid importance.
• Cities - Generally classed as mid to low importance.
• Places - Generally classed as mid to low importance.
• Schools - Generally classed as mid to low importance.

[edit] Assessment Team

The list of members below make up the main members of the WikiProject India Assessment team. Members of the team who are bolded (below) are currently active - they are most likely to assess articles, so please direct any enquiries regarding assessment or the assessment department towards them.

1. Dwaipayanc (talk · contribs)
2. GDibyendu (talk · contribs)
3. Kensplanet (talk · contribs)
4. Mspraveen (talk · contribs)
5. Ncmvocalist (talk · contribs) - currently, main member of assessment team
6. Pruthvi.Vallabh (talk · contribs)
7. Tinucherian (talk · contribs)

[edit] New members

If you would like to join the assessment team, please add your name below.

1. Redtigerxyz (talk · contribs) I already assessed WikiProject Hinduism articles, most of which have WP India tags, I am interested more in Maharashtra and Mumbai related articles as well as Indian history or culture e.g art, music, dance articles. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:21, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
2. Innerproduct (talk · contribs) --Innerproduct (talk) 07:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
3. Ankitbhatt (talk · contribs) -- Ankitbhatt (talk) 12:11, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
4. Daydreamer302000 (talk · contribs) -- I am already a member of the review team and have assessed several articles. I am also on the assessment teams of WikiProject Computer Science and WikiProject Computing.
5. Gautamgoa1984 (talk) 12:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Example assessments

To assess an article, paste one of the following onto the article's talk page.

Quality

• {{WP India|class=FA}} - to rate an article at FA-Class
• {{WP India|class=A}} - to rate an article at A-Class
• {{WP India|class=GA}} - to rate an article at GA-Class
• {{WP India|class=B}} - to rate an article at B-Class
• {{WP India|class=Start}} - to rate an article at Start-Class
• {{WP India|class=Stub}} - to rate an article at Stub-Class
• {{WP India}} - to leave the article un-assessed.

Importance

• {{WP India|importance=Top}} - to rate an article at Top importance
• {{WP India|importance=High}} - to rate an article at High importance
• {{WP India|importance=Mid}} - to rate an article at Mid importance
• {{WP India|importance=Low}} - to rate an article at Low importance

[edit] Log

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here. Unfortunately, due to its extreme size, it cannot be transcluded directly.

[edit] Workgroup-level statistics

Protected areas of India articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 1 GA 1 1 2 B 1 9 5 1 9 25 C 1 2 3 Start 3 15 26 55 99 Stub 8 37 20 123 188 Assessed 4 34 69 21 190 318 Unassessed 45 45 Total 4 34 69 21 235 363	Indian states articles Importance Top High Mid None Total Quality FA 6 6 FL 2 2 B 1 22 23 Start 1 1 30 32 List 10 10 Assessed 1 1 1 70 73 Unassessed 1 1 Total 1 1 1 71 74
Andhra Pradesh articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 1 GA 6 6 B 1 4 3 8 16 C 1 1 2 4 Start 2 13 36 13 113 177 Stub 2 14 89 96 1737 1938 List 10 10 Assessed 5 32 128 110 1877 2152 Unassessed 58 58 Total 5 32 128 110 1935 2210	Goa articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality GA 1 1 B 1 1 6 8 C 2 2 Start 5 3 16 35 59 Stub 2 5 37 24 124 192 List 1 4 5 Assessed 7 9 54 25 172 267 Unassessed 69 69 Total 7 9 54 25 241 336
Gujarat articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 2 2 GA 1 1 B 1 1 2 2 6 Start 6 10 6 37 59 Stub 1 7 50 25 459 542 List 1 5 6 Assessed 3 14 62 31 506 616 Unassessed 14 14 Total 3 14 62 31 520 630	Himachal Pradesh articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 1 GA 1 1 B 4 2 1 7 Start 4 13 30 19 66 Stub 3 49 33 124 209 List 1 1 2 4 Assessed 9 20 79 33 147 288 Unassessed 1 17 18 Total 9 20 80 33 164 306
Karnataka articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 2 6 1 9 18 A 1 1 GA 1 2 3 B 3 4 5 51 63 C 1 4 1 11 17 Start 8 28 68 18 433 555 Stub 8 78 54 2685 2825 List 2 20 22 Assessed 13 48 156 76 3211 3504 Unassessed 205 205 Total 13 48 156 76 3416 3709	Kerala articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 1 2 4 A 2 2 GA 1 3 4 B 4 11 11 1 38 65 C 1 2 3 1 5 12 Start 6 81 93 75 317 572 Stub 2 28 116 343 2948 3437 List 1 4 5 20 30 Assessed 15 125 229 426 3331 4126 Unassessed 584 584 Total 15 125 229 426 3915 4710
Maharashtra articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 1 1 3 FL 1 1 2 GA 1 1 5 1 5 13 B 3 6 8 5 33 55 C 2 1 6 8 17 Start 3 12 83 187 344 629 Stub 2 16 126 263 1474 1881 List 1 2 2 4 25 34 Assessed 10 40 226 467 1891 2634 Unassessed 1 1 266 268 Total 10 41 226 468 2157 2902	Punjab articles Importance Top Mid Low None Total Quality B 3 3 Start 1 1 2 Stub 3 1 4 Assessed 3 1 4 1 9 Unassessed 1 4 5 Total 3 2 4 5 14
Uttarakhand articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality GA 1 1 B 3 3 6 Start 3 13 24 23 63 Stub 5 50 30 96 181 List 1 1 Assessed 6 18 74 30 124 252 Unassessed 48 48 Total 6 18 74 30 172 300	Tamil Nadu articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 5 5 FL 1 1 GA 3 12 15 B 2 6 9 97 114 C 1 3 1 22 27 Start 1 17 76 26 761 881 Stub 1 21 155 231 2841 3249 List 2 3 1 36 42 Assessed 6 48 247 258 3775 4334 Unassessed 1 329 330 Total 6 48 248 258 4104 4664
West Bengal articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 2 1 3 6 FL 1 1 GA 1 1 3 5 B 3 12 7 12 34 C 4 8 1 13 Start 3 61 257 73 91 485 Stub 2 6 137 266 324 735 List 1 1 6 8 Assessed 12 86 410 339 440 1287 Unassessed 2 60 104 166 Total 12 88 470 339 544 1453	Indian cities articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 2 7 10 FL 1 1 2 A 1 1 GA 1 1 B 3 16 18 1 29 67 C 2 5 3 5 15 Start 3 29 342 243 183 800 Stub 3 164 822 938 1927 List 1 4 5 Assessed 9 52 530 1069 1168 2828 Unassessed 61 61 Total 9 52 530 1069 1229 2889

Chennai articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 1 GA 1 1 B 1 2 14 17 C 1 1 2 Start 4 6 9 2 95 116 Stub 1 25 28 7 217 278 List 1 2 4 7 Assessed 8 34 39 9 332 422 Unassessed 6 6 Total 8 34 39 9 338 428

Mumbai articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 1 FL 1 1 GA 1 2 1 1 1 6 B 6 5 5 10 26 C 1 1 3 1 1 7 Start 30 62 59 76 11 238 Stub 5 22 97 122 19 265 List 2 2 1 1 6 Assessed 43 95 168 211 33 550 Unassessed 1 1 2 Total 43 95 169 211 34 552

Indian politics articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 3 4 FL 3 3 GA 1 4 5 B 7 4 6 1 86 104 C 1 2 3 14 20 Start 21 35 62 26 369 513 Stub 67 42 600 250 2034 2993 List 2 4 8 1 66 81 Assessed 99 87 679 279 2579 3723 Unassessed 2 443 445 Total 99 87 681 279 3022 4168

Indian districts articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FL 1 1 GA 1 1 B 4 1 1 9 15 C 1 1 Start 1 16 12 2 70 101 Stub 10 11 37 5 463 526 List 6 1 7 Assessed 22 29 50 7 544 652 Unassessed 23 23 Total 22 29 50 7 567 675

Indian history articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 6 2 12 20 FL 1 1 GA 1 1 2 8 12 B 6 16 13 3 132 170 C 3 4 26 33 Start 1 34 101 65 631 832 Stub 24 70 106 1185 1385 List 7 3 12 22 Assessed 7 81 195 185 2007 2475 Unassessed 1 337 338 Total 7 81 196 185 2344 2813

Indian military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 4 4 A 2 2 GA 3 3 B 70 70 Start 653 653 Stub 611 611 Assessed 1343 1343 Total 1343 1343

Indian cinema articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 2 1 3 A 1 1 GA 1 2 12 15 B 1 9 4 43 57 C 1 1 8 10 Start 21 40 11 1037 1109 Stub 1 23 76 74 5308 5482 List 1 8 13 539 561 Assessed 3 60 130 98 6947 7238 Unassessed 1222 1222 Total 3 60 130 98 8169 8460	Indian television articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality GA 1 1 B 1 1 8 10 C 2 2 Start 3 18 28 14 76 139 Stub 8 34 43 67 366 518 List 11 11 Assessed 12 53 71 81 464 681 Unassessed 270 270 Total 12 53 71 81 734 951
Indian literature articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 3 3 A 1 1 B 1 4 3 2 9 19 Start 4 19 52 14 107 196 Stub 1 7 60 59 201 328 List 3 3 Assessed 6 34 115 75 320 550 Unassessed 1 2 3 Total 6 34 116 75 322 553	Classical Tamil articles Importance High Low None Total Quality FA 2 2 C 1 1 Start 1 6 7 Stub 2 1 5 8 Assessed 3 1 14 18 Total 3 1 14 18
Indian music articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality GA 2 1 1 4 B 1 7 3 1 12 24 C 3 4 1 6 14 Start 12 58 84 19 161 334 Stub 37 94 8 619 758 List 7 2 3 12 Assessed 16 115 185 28 802 1146 Unassessed 295 295 Total 16 115 185 28 1097 1441

Indian Christianity work group articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality GA 2 1 2 5 B 9 2 6 4 1 22 C 4 2 1 7 Start 23 7 15 29 117 191 Stub 3 9 82 156 250 List 2 6 4 12 Assessed 43 11 38 121 274 487 Unassessed 1 1 Total 43 11 38 121 275 488