Talk:Wigan Athletic F.C.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wigan Athletic F.C. article. |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||
| This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_-_no_key.png){kind=small}
[edit] Location
The stadium ia located in Newtown, and isn't nearest to Springfield / Beech Hill geographically like some people believe. see for the club's address on the offical website.
If I'm not mistaken, isn't Newtown mentioned/included in the stadium's address on the back of match tickets? Sorry, no link, I'm afraid. Also, there is poor grammar in the 'Traditions at Wigan Athletic' section: 'Wigans', 'premiership' etc.82.31.33.178 21:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Expansion
This article could really use a lot more in terms of Wigan's history, especially with the club now playing in the top flight of English football. Perhaps someone more familiar with Wigan's history could add to this article. See other Premier League teams for examples. - Pal 14:56, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
this has been partially resolved to the extent of being able to provide a reasonable history from 1978. other premier league clubs have famous player lists, which could be added, but other than that - its pretty much wholly completed (history at least) ~Markz17
[edit] Table
the League table needs to be in table format: anyone up to it?
[edit] Capacity
Today's (26 Dec 2005) attendance has been reported as 25,017 by every source I can find, meaning the capacity of 25,004 stated in the article must be incorrect. Wigan's official site states the capacity as 25,000 exactly, [1] states 24,826. I'm going to put the capacity as 25,017 for now, but if anyone knows the correct figure could they please update it Oldelpaso 19:25, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
-- sorted. the ground has recently had 120 odd seats added.
- Wigan's FC site is not a reliable source, you need a reliable third party source. The offical JJB site lists the capacity at 24,826, and I have restored that figure. What's important is verifiability not truth, it's probable the current capacity is more than that but without reliable third party sources please do not change it. One Night In Hackney 08:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- The stadium is jointly owned by Wigan Athletic and Wigan Warriors, they are no less reliable sources than the JJB Stadium site. The JJB Stadium site has not been updated in over a year, the Wigan Warriors site is more up to date: The stadium is an all seater arena with a seating capacity of 25,138 (this was increased from 25,004 in December 2005 following building work). Third party sources: BBC, Setanta, ITV. Oldelpaso 10:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I am a wiganer and happen to know that the record attendance at the jjb is 25,023 vs liverpool in 2005/2006 season as I went to that match. So far no crowd has surpassed that not in rugby or football. Also every seat was filled for that game there was absolutely no seats left so I'm geussing that is the true capacity. Wiki235 09:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
The record attendance at the JJB Stadium for Wigan Athletic is 25,133 for a match against Manchester United on May 11, 2008:[2] Dean1960 (talk) 21:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Current events
A lot of this article is written in the style of a newspaper article. Please consider adding such content and commentary to WikiNews instead. Stifle 12:20, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
resolved to an extent in the big edit i made a few weeks ago - Markz17
[edit] Old club badge
Should there be a picture of the old 'Tree and Crown' badge on the page? Maybe in the history section.
I AGREE, but dont have the image, anyone can help ? - Markz17
I have a picture, anyone who can put a pic on the page, please e-mail me, [email removed]- Tedders
[edit] Captain
Why is there a "club captain", "team captain" and "vice captain"? Surely it's just "captain" and "vice captain", the latter being captain a lot due to the former not playing. The captain should neither player be on the pitch is surely not set in stone?
Officialy, Matt Jackson is the club captain but Arjan De Zeeuw has been appointed as the team captain, with Baines as vice. Tedders
[edit] Cleanup
I've cleaned up the 'Traditions' section, adding links and improving the ridiculously informal tone and grammar. Also, can i suggest that Keith Gillespie be included as a notable former player, as his stint at Man United made him fairly famous. 82.31.32.48 14:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New kit
can someone make a kit that has big shoulders like Wigan's real one?
[edit] Kit edit war
Aa a couple of users are revert-warring over what kit to use in the infobox, a little discussion wouldn't go amiss. Two points: firstly, the infobox kit representations are supposed to be general, not featuring every last detail and secondly, to me Image:Kit_body_Wigan_home07.png, with its jagged edges does not look much like the actual kit itself, so thinwhitesides looks like the right template to use. Oldelpaso 23:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
I made a new one! FootyStavros 22:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Wigan athletic badge.png
Image:Wigan athletic badge.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New crest
Wigan Athletic have revealed a new club crest on their website - can someone legally upload it onto the Wigan page? Steveweiser (talk) 18:59, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- yeah somebody add it here is the link http://www.wiganlatics.premiumtv.co.uk/javaImages/b/e4/0,,10429~3662859,00.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by DP08 (talk • contribs) 18:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Honors
"2007/08 Season 17 home games without defeat. They play Manchester United in the last game of the season with the chance to become the only team not to lose at home during the season."
Even as a fan with wishful thinking, I know this is not right. Premierleague.com has them standing at 8-5-6 on the season, far from unbeaten at home. An impressive record, but not unbeaten. I assume it should therefore be removed. NJDevils1087 (talk) 05:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Recentism
While I accept that Wigan's stint in the Premier League is hugely significant to the club's history, the fact that the last two seasons gets almost three times as much coverage in the "history" section as the preceding 70-odd years is ludicrous. The Premier League section needs trimming considerably...... ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Admittedly this is the case - but attendances have gone up by a factor of 10 since successive promotions - hence recentism is inevitable. I feel that rather than trimming Premier League history extensively - it may be more appropriate for someone to bulk up the early history (see Blackburn Rovers, Manchester United I'd gladly do it - but sources are difficult to find. markz17 (talk) 04:53, 04 June 2008 (GMT)
[edit] Current Squad
Can people please stop messing around with this section by putting in players who haven't even signed Wigan (yet?). Please enter a suitable link as proof, in the players profile. Also the current squad is for those players who have signed professional contracts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctormouse (talk • contribs) 13:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Amr Zaki
Not sure when a player who has just signed up for the club becomes a "former player". Have removed his name from the list of "Notable former players". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmisra (talk • contribs) 08:11, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 2000 Football League Second Division playoff final
While I'm sure you guys would rather not be reminded of that day (although looking at our respective league positions now, I think you could be said to have had the last laugh :-) ) I was wondering if anyone could tell me who WAFC's captain on the day was, as I understand the usual captain at that time was Carl Bradshaw, who was left on the bench that day........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
It was Stuart Balmer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.157.226 (talk) 13:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Election to The Football League
"Boston United were the Northern Premier League leaders, therefore Wigan, as runners-up were put forward for election." -- I don't see how that follows. Why were Boston United not put up for election? --Jameboy (talk) 00:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Boston's ground was not up to League standard. Has been amended accordingly. James3500 (talk) 14:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Wigan Warriors
The Fanbase and Supporters section sounds like it has been hacked several times and is trying to balance some personal opinion and objective facts. There are several sentences that are clearly written by several people e.g.
"Attendances at Wigan Athletic games are certainly disappointing by Premier League standards but easily outweigh those of the Wigan Warriors Rugby League, showing the shift in popularity from the failing Super League side."
I think that this is two sentences, written by two people and the subjective second half is barely worth keeping in this section as there is another section covering this subject. If it is staying then citations are needed for comparing the attendances between the clubs and for suggesting that Wigan Warriors is a 'failing Super League side'. I think the 'failing' adjective should be removed. Amelvin1968 (talk) 13:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've removed the claim in the Fanbase & Supporters section about the Latics' attendance outweighing the Warriors' for two reasons:
-
- 1) This fact can be disputed, depending on whether you count away support, pre-season fixtures, cup fixtures, or when you look at timescale. When making a claim, make the point, and then follow with explained evidence, and provide a source to back this evidence up. "Athletic have more fans than Warriors", or vice versa, is an empty statement on its own.
- 2) It's not appropriate for this article. The only link between the Latics and the Warriors when it comes to attendance is the JJB Stadium, therefore, such analysis should be provided there (and has been already). GW(talk) 18:17, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
