Talk:Criticism of intellectual property

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Neutrality dispute

This article had the "The neutrality of this article is disputed." tag, apparently since March 2008. The talk page was emtpy, however. It seems obvious that an article titled "Criticism of intellectual property" contains only criticism, an therefore is not neutral with respect to the term "intellectual property". It might, however, be neutral about that criticism, which is the subject of the article. Please indicate why you dispute the neutrality of an article when you set the tag. This will help fix the problem. --Roger Jeurissen (talk) 22:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

I mostly agree, but I'd like to point out that criticism articles can also contain responses to criticism. For example, Criticism of Wal-Mart (a good article) has a mostly neutral tone, explaining the Wal-Mart POV alongside common criticisms. I wasn't the person who tagged the article as disputed neutrality, but I think it could be improved by a little bit more pro-IP response. --Explodicle (T/C) 14:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Original research everywhere

It looks like most of this is just original research. If no one has any objections, I'm just going to stip it down to the sourced statements and then add stuff back from there. --Explodicle (talk) 20:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)