Building society
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A building society is a financial institution, owned by its members, that offers banking and other financial services, especially mortgage lending.
The term building society first arose in the 19th century, in the United Kingdom, from co-operative savings groups. In the UK today building societies actively compete with banks for most personal banking services, especially mortgage lending and deposit accounts. At the start of 2008, there were 59 building societies in the UK (listed below) with total assets exceeding £360 billion[1]. Every building society in the UK is a member of the Building Societies Association. The number of societies in the UK fell by four during 2008 due to a series of mergers brought about, to a large extent, by the consequences of the financial crisis of 2007-2009, and further mergers are planned for the first few months of 2009.
[edit] History
The original Building Society was formed in Birmingham in 1774. Most of the original societies were fully terminating, where they would be dissolved when all members had a house: the last of them was wound up in 1980. In the 1830s and 1840s a new development took place with the Permanent Building Society, where the society continued on a rolling basis, continually taking in new members as earlier ones completed purchases, such as Leek United Building Society. The main legislative framework for the Building Society was the Building Society Act of 1874, with subsequent amending legislation in 1894, 1939 (see Coney Hall), and 1960.
In their heyday, there were hundreds of building societies: just about every town in the country had a building society named after that town. Over succeeding decades the number of societies has decreased, as various societies merged to form larger ones, often renaming in the process, and other societies opted for demutualisation followed by - in the great majority of cases - eventual takeover by a listed bank. Most of the existing larger building societies are the end result of the mergers of many smaller societies.
[edit] 1980s and 1990s
In the 1980s, British banking laws were changed to allow building societies to offer banking services equivalent to normal banks. The management of a number of societies still felt that they were unable to compete with the banks, and a new Building Society Act was passed in 1986 in response to their concerns. This permitted societies to 'demutualise'. If more than 75% of members voted in favour, the building society would then become a limited company like any other. Members' mutual rights were exchanged for shares in this new company. A number of the larger societies made such proposals to their members and all were accepted. Some became independent companies quoted on the London Stock Exchange, others were acquired by larger financial groups.
A movement arose whereby investors would open a savings account with a mutual building society, thereby getting voting rights in the society, and pressurise for a vote on demutualisation, with the intent of getting a windfall payment as a result. A number of societies' members and managers were very unhappy about such investors, who were termed carpetbaggers, maintaining that as mutual societies, they could supply better and cheaper home loans than the banks and demutualised societies, as they only had to make a profit to cover their operational costs, and had no need to generate an additional profit to return to shareholders.
In the end, after a number of large demutualisations, and pressure from carpetbaggers moving from one building society to another to cream off the windfalls, most of the remaining societies modified their rules of membership in the late 1990s. The method usually adopted were membership rules to ensure that anyone newly joining a society would, for the first few years, be unable to get any profit out of a demutualisation. With the chance of a quick profit removed, the wave of demutualisations came to an end in 2000.
One academic study (Heffernan, 2003) found that demutualised societies' pricing behaviour on deposits and mortgages was more favourable to shareholders than to customers, with the remaining mutual building societies offering consistently better rates.[2]
Deposits with building societies of up to £50,000 per individual, per institution, are normally protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), but Nationwide and Yorkshire Building Societies negotiated a temporary change to the terms of the FSCS to protect members of the societies they are acquiring in late 2008/early 2009. The amended terms allow former members of multiple societies which merge into one to maintain multiple entitlements to FSCS protection until 30 September 2009, so (for example) a member with £50,000 in each of Nationwide, Cheshire and Derbyshire would retain £150,000 of FSCS protection for their funds in the merged Nationwide.[3]
[edit] List of building societies in the United Kingdom
The remaining building societies are:
(Total group assets of building societies) Source: Building Societies Association[1] updated for subsequent mergers and the administration of Dunfermline Building Society
* These societies do not form part of a corporate business group, although they may own other businesses.
[edit] List of building societies in the United Kingdom that have demutualised
Ten building societies of the United Kingdom demutualised between 1989 and 2000, either becoming a bank or being acquired by a larger bank.[10][11] By 2008, every building society that floated on the stock market in the wave of demutualisations of the 1980s and 1990s has either been sold to a conventional bank, or been nationalised.[11]
| Building Society | Details | Current position | Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abbey National | Converted to plc | Now known as "Abbey", a subsidiary of Banco Santander, soon to be rebranded to simply Santander | 1989 |
| Cheltenham and Gloucester | takeover by Lloyds Bank |
Now part of Lloyds TSB although C&G still have a branch network. It has recently been announced that the branch network is to be closed; with the brand in continued use online by the Lloyds banking group | 1994 |
| National & Provincial Building Society | takeover by Abbey National |
Business merged into Abbey National, name no longer used | 1995 |
| Alliance & Leicester | Converted to plc | Acquired by Banco Santander, which also owns Abbey, in October 2008. Soon to be rebranded Santander. | 1997 |
| Bristol and West | takeover by the Bank of Ireland |
Remains a division of Bank of Ireland but its savings balances and branch network were transferred to the Britannia Building Society in 2005 |
1997 |
| Halifax | Converted to plc | Became part of HBOS in 2001, which itself became part of Lloyds Banking Group in 2009. Trading name still in use. |
1997 |
| Northern Rock | Converted to plc | Nationalised in February 2008 following near bankruptcy due to the Subprime mortgage crisis | 1997 |
| The Woolwich | Converted to plc | Now part of Barclays plc. Woolwich brand name now only used for mortgages from Barclays with the Woolwich branch network merging with that of Barclays in 2007 |
1997 |
| Birmingham Midshires | takeover by the Halifax | Now owned by Lloyds Banking Group | 1999 |
| Bradford & Bingley | Converted to plc | Nationalisation with sale of savings book to Banco Santander-owned Abbey (announced 29 September 2008) | 2000 |
[edit] List of building societies in the United Kingdom that no longer exist
The following is an incomplete list of building societies in the United Kingdom that no longer exist, since they either merged with or were taken over by other building societies [12].
[edit] Other countries
- Australia: In Australia, building societies evolved along British lines. Because of strict regulations on banks, building societies flourished until the deregulation of the Australian financial industry in the 1980s. Eventually many of the smaller building societies disappeared, while some of the largest (such as St. George) officially attained the status of banks.
- Austria: In Austria there are four building societies: Allgemeine Bausparkasse (ABV), Raiffeisen-Bausparkasse, Bausparkasse Wüstenrot AG and Bausparkasse der Sparkassen (savings bank).
- Finland: In Finland the Mortgage Society of Finland, a permanent building society, was founded in 1860. Since 2002 mortgage loans are handled by Suomen AsuntoHypoPankki, the licensed bank owned by the society.
- Germany: In Germany there are 11 Bausparkassen der Sparkassen (savings bank) named Landesbausparkassen (LBS) and 15 Bausparkassen of the private banks, for example Schwäbisch Hall, Wüstenrot, Deutsche Bank Bauspar AG etc.
- Ireland: In Ireland, the three building societies are as follows; EBS Building Society, ICS Building Society, and Irish Nationwide Building Society
- Jamaica: In Jamaica, four building societies compete with commercial banks and credits unions for most consumer financial services.
- United States: In the United States, savings and loan associations have a similar organisation and purpose.
- New Zealand: In New Zealand, a number of building societies have been established. However the New Zealand finance company crash of 2006-2008 and the flow on from the credit crisis have lead to the consolidation, collapse and restructuring of many, notably Southland Building Society who moved in October 2008 to become a registered bank.
[edit] Operational differences from banks
- Roll numbers
Because most building societies were not direct members of the UK clearing system, it was common for them to use a roll number to identify accounts rather than to allocate a six-digit sort-code and eight-digit account number to the BACS standards.
More recently, building societies have tended to obtain sort-code and account number allocations within the clearing system, and hence the use of roll numbers has diminished. Nationwide is the most notable society to have discontinued the use of roll numbers completely.[15] When using BACS, roll numbers are entered into the Reference field whilst the building society's generic sort-code and account number would be entered in the standard BACS fields.[16]
[edit] References
- ^ a b Building Societies Association
- ^ Shelagh Heffernan. "The Effect of UK Building Society Conversion on Pricing Behaviour (March 2003)" (pdf). Faculty of Finance, CASS Business School, City of London. http://www.cass.city.ac.uk/facfin/papers/WP2003/Mutuals-WP.pdf. Retrieved on 2007-10-10.
- ^ http://www.moneymadeclear.fsa.gov.uk/news/product/bs_merger_compensation.html
- ^ Building Societies ranked by asset size Building Societies Association (Retrieved 28 March 2009)
- ^ BSA welcomes mergers (Retrieved 8 September 2008)
- ^ Britannia and Co-operative Financial Services unveil plans for super-mutual (Retrieved 22 January 2009)
- ^ http://www.barnsley-bs.co.uk/mergerstatement.htm
- ^ Catholic Building Society members approve the merger with Chelsea Building Society (Retrieved 29 November 2008)
- ^ Merger of Skipton Building Society and Scarborough Building Society (retrieved 29 November 2008)
- ^ Building Society Takeovers and Flotations Building Societies Association website (Retrieved 5 April 2007)
- ^ a b Pollock, Ian (2008-09-29). "Not such a good idea after all?". bbc.co.uk. BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7641925.stm. Retrieved on 2008-10-01.
- ^ Building Society Mergers and Conversions since 1980 Building Societies Association website (Retrieved 5 April 2007)
- ^ http://www.bsa.org.uk/docs/consumerpdfs/yearbooknamechangepart1.pdf retrieved 2008-07-12.
- ^ The Temperance Permanent was so-called because the directors were required to sign the pledge, a requirement which was dropped with the merger and name-change — to the reported dismay of some members. [The Times, Friday, Apr 25, 1975; pg. 4; Issue 59379; col E, 'Temperance abandoned by building society'. Retrieved from InfoTrac on July 17, 2008].
- ^ Sort code and account number replaces roll number
- ^ Roll Number at Experian
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
| “ | With hindsight they raised more money than they would have done had they stayed as building societies and with the credit crunch that now looks like a mistake,' said Adrian Coles. But John Wriglesworth argues that losing their independence because of this was certainly not inevitable ... | ” |
|
—Analysis after the last of the UK's demutualised building societies lost its independence, Ian Pollock, Ibid. |
||
- Building Societies Association
- The History of Building Societies from the Building Societies Association website.
- Pollock, Ian (29-09-2008). "Not such a good idea after all?". news.bbc.co.uk. BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7641925.stm.
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
