Welcome to fedrix.com on July 12 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

2009 structural changes to local government in England

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Structural changes to local government in England were effected on 1 April 2009, whereby a number of new unitary authorities were created in parts of the country which previously operated a 'two-tier' system of counties and districts. In five shire counties the functions of the county and district councils were combined into a single authority; and in two counties the powers of the county council were absorbed into a significantly reduced number of districts.

Elections to the new authorities took place on 1 May 2008 for some of the new authorities, which took up their powers on 1 April 2009. The other new authorities retain the existing county council as the "continuing authority" as of 1 April 2009 with elections taking place two months later on 4 June 2009.

Contents

[edit] Background

Following the passing of the Local Government Act 1992, the Local Government Commission for England recommended a number of unitary authorities to be created in England during the 1990s. The changes that were implemented meant that much of the country continued to have a two-tier arrangement of local government.[1] Further proposals for unitary authorities in northern England, tied to the option of regional devolution, were put to a referendum in 2004 and were rejected. In 2006, the white paper Strong and Prosperous Communities invited local authorities in England to submit their own consensus-based proposals for unitary authority arrangements, to be submitted before 25 January 2007. Selected submissions went to a public consultation from March until June, with successful proposals announced in July. Legislative requirements for implementation were in place following the enactment of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007.

[edit] Proposed changes

[edit] Early responses

Various local councils indicated they wish to seek unitary authority status. Four medium-sized towns and historic county boroughs, overlooked by the 1990s review: Ipswich, Oxford, Norwich and Exeter[2] proposed unitary status on their present boundaries, and commissioned a report jointly to press their case.[3] Norwich announced its intention to respond to the invitation,[4] as did Ipswich and Exeter.[5][6] In Lancashire, Preston and South Ribble desired to form a single unitary authority although Preston bid for it alone.[7][8] The City of Lancaster considered seeking unitary status on its present boundaries (having supported a merger with South Lakeland and Barrow-in-Furness to form a Morecambe Bay unitary authority during the referendums review).[9] Blackpool advocated a merger with the Fylde and Wyre districts, which they did not support.[10] Pendle and Burnley also tried to form a unitary authority with Rossendale; however Rossendale rejected this.

The Local Government Chronicle suggested that the non-metropolitan counties of Cornwall, Shropshire, Durham, Cumbria and Northumberland would fit the government's criteria, and that the government would be unlikely to favour carving out unitary authorities from existing two-tier counties.[11] Shropshire County Council, as well as two of the five districts of Shropshire, stated their wish for a move to unitary status.[12][13] The issue was considered in Durham and Cumbria[14][15] and the idea of a North Cumbria authority covering the Eden, Copeland, Carlisle and Allerdale districts had some support.[16] The issue was also considered in Northumberland, with the county council in favour of one Northumberland unitary authority. Alan Beith, the MP for Berwick at the far north of Northumberland, suggested instead a three unitary solution, with authorities for the largely rural north and south-west, and an authority for the urban south-east (Wansbeck and Blyth Valley).[17]

[edit] Consultation period

On 26 January 2007, the government confirmed that 26 proposals for unitary authorities had been received.[18] Various county councils proposed they should become unitary authorities: Bedfordshire, Cheshire, Cornwall, Cumbria, Durham, North Yorkshire, Northumberland, Shropshire, Somerset and Wiltshire. Districts seeking to become unitary authorities on their own were Bedford, Exeter, Ipswich, Lancaster, Oxford, Preston. Pendle and Burnley proposed merging as a unitary authority. On 27 March 2007, the government announced that the proposals by Bedfordshire, Bedford, Cornwall, Cheshire, Cumbria, Durham, Exeter, Ipswich, North Yorkshire, Norwich, Shropshire, Somerset and Wiltshire to become unitary authorities would go into the next phase, as would the proposal of Chester for a two-unitary authority Cheshire and by the districts of Northumberland for a two-unitary Northumberland.[19]

On 25 July 2007 it was announced that the unitary proposals by Cumbria, North Yorkshire and Somerset[20] had been rejected.[21] On 5 December 2007 it was explained that the unitary proposals by Exeter, and Ipswich, like those of Norwich (which were referred for review on 25 July 2007) did not meet the requirements to proceed; but may be reconsidered after the Boundary Committee has conducted a review of local government structures across the whole of the two-tier counties they are currently a part of.

A legal challenge was made by Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council and by Congleton Borough Council to the government's decisions, on the basis (amongst other things) that the reviews were made without statutory authority. The High Court and then on 4 March 2008 the Court of Appeal rejected the challenge, finding that the review had been legalized retrospectively.[22]

Region Proposed by Proposal Result
East Bedfordshire County Council single unitary authority N Not proceeding
Bedford Borough Council unitary authority with existing boundaries Check markY Proceeding
Mid Bedfordshire District Council
South Bedfordshire District Council		 unitary Central Bedfordshire Check markY Proceeding
Ipswich Borough Council unitary authority with existing boundaries Referred to Boundary Committee[23] †
Norwich City Council unitary authority with existing boundaries Referred to Boundary Committee[23] ‡
East Midlands no bids
London not affected by the review
North East Durham County Council single unitary authority Check markY Proceeding
Northumberland County Council single unitary authority Check markY Proceeding
Northumberland districts two unitary authorities N Not proceeding
North West Cheshire County Council single unitary authority N Not proceeding
Chester City Council two unitary authorities:
Cheshire West and Chester and Cheshire East[24]		 Check markY Proceeding
Cumbria County Council single unitary authority N Not proceeding
South East no bids
South West Cornwall County Council single unitary authority Check markY Proceeding
Exeter City Council unitary authority with existing boundaries Referred to Boundary Committee[23] †
Somerset County Council single unitary authority N Not proceeding
Wiltshire County Council single unitary authority Check markY Proceeding
Yorkshire and the Humber North Yorkshire County Council single unitary authority N Not proceeding
West Midlands Shropshire County Council single unitary authority Check markY Proceeding

† - in the context of examining options for unitary arrangements in the wider county area.

‡ - the Boundary Committee is asked to advise whether an alternative unitary proposal for Norwich based on revised council boundaries could deliver the required improvements.

[edit] Successful proposals

On 27 March 2007 Local Government Minister Phil Woolas announced that 16 councils bidding for unitary status had been shortlisted to go forward for public consultation.[25] On 25 July 2007 Woolas' successor John Healey announced that nine proposals would proceed, subject to the approval of Parliament in the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007.[26] A further announcement on 5 December indicated that only the five county level proposals (Cornwall, Durham, Northumberland, Shropshire, and Wiltshire) would proceed, while further consideration was to be given to the various proposals submitted for two more county areas (Bedfordshire and Cheshire).[27] On 18 December it was confirmed that the two-authority plan for Cheshire would proceed.[28] On 6 March 2008 it was confirmed that proposals for Bedford Borough Council to become a unitary authority on its existing boundaries, and for Mid Bedfordshire District Council and South Bedfordshire District Council to merge to create a new Central Bedfordshire authority would be implemented.

[edit] Single authorities

In the following areas, the existing non-metropolitan county will also become a non-metropolitan district and the existing non-metropolitan districts will be abolished.

Ceremonial county Non-metropolitan districts
abolished in 2009		 New unitary authority
from 2009		 Existing unitary authorities
from 1990s reforms		 Map
Cornwall Penwith
Kerrier
Carrick
Restormel (Borough)
Caradon
North Cornwall		 Cornwall Isles of Scilly †
Durham Durham (City)
Easington
Sedgefield (Borough)
Teesdale
Wear Valley
Derwentside
Chester-le-Street		 Durham Hartlepool
Darlington
Stockton-on-Tees (part)
Northumberland Blyth Valley (Borough)
Wansbeck
Castle Morpeth (Borough)
Tynedale
Alnwick
Berwick-upon-Tweed (Borough)		 Northumberland none
Shropshire North Shropshire
Oswestry (Borough)
Shrewsbury and Atcham (Borough)
South Shropshire
Bridgnorth		 Shropshire Telford and Wrekin
Wiltshire Salisbury
West Wiltshire
Kennet
North Wiltshire		 Wiltshire Swindon

† sui generis unitary authority since 1890

[edit] Multiple authorities

In the following areas, the existing non-metropolitan county will be abolished. The two new non-metropolitan districts in Cheshire (resulting from amalgamations of the existing districts) will each also be a non-metropolitan county. In Bedfordshire the new Central Bedfordshire non-metropolitan district (resulting from the amalgamation of two existing districts) will be also a non-metropolitan county, whilst the existing Bedford non-metropolitan district will gain non-metropolitan county status.

Ceremonial county Non-metropolitan districts
abolished in 2009		 New unitary authorities
from 2009		 Existing unitary authorities
from 1990s reforms		 Map
Bedfordshire Mid Bedfordshire
South Bedfordshire		 1. Bedford ‡
2. Central Bedfordshire		 3. Luton
Cheshire Ellesmere Port and Neston (Borough)
Chester (District and City)
Crewe and Nantwich (Borough)
Congleton (Borough)
Macclesfield (Borough)
Vale Royal (Borough)		 1. Cheshire West and Chester[29][30]
2. Cheshire East		 3. Warrington
4. Halton

‡ existing district

[edit] Further changes

The Boundary Committee for England is currently carrying structural reviews for Norfolk, Suffolk and Devon.[31]

Initial draft proposals were published in July 2008 with further draft proposals published in March 2009. The committee was expected to make final recommendations by 31 December 2008, but these have been delayed, due to legal challenges, [32] and are now due in July 2009. [33]. Any changes in local government resulting from these structural reviews would come into effect in 2011.

[edit] Draft Proposals for Devon

The further draft recommendations propose two unitary options:

  • A Devon unitary authority comprising the existing county of Devon, with no changes to Plymouth and Torbay.
  • An Exeter and Exmouth unitary authority, and a unitary authority covering the remainder of Devon, with no changes to Plymouth and Torbay. [34]

[edit] Draft Proposals for Norfolk

The further draft recommendations propose two unitary options:

  • A single Norfolk unitary authority comprising the existing county of Norfolk.
  • A two authority structure with greater Norwich unitary authority and a rural Norfolk unitary authority for the rest of the county. [35]

[edit] Draft Proposals for Suffolk

The further draft recommendations propose two unitary options:

  • A single Suffolk unitary authority comprising the existing county of Suffolk.
  • A two authority structure with a North Haven [36] unitary authority consisting of Ipswich and Felixstowe, and a rural Suffolk unitary authority for the rest of the county. [37]

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Sancton, A., Merger Mania: The Assault on Local Government, (2000)
  2. ^ "Council Submits Unitary Case To Minister". Exeter City Council. 2006-05-09. http://www.exeter.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=5105. 
  3. ^ "Four Councils Unite In Bid For Unitary Status" (DOC). Exeter City Council. 2006-05-09. http://www.exeter.gov.uk/media/doc/0/5/0604245FourcitiesINLOGOVreview_1.doc. 
  4. ^ "City welcomes new council plans". Norwich Evening News. 2006-10-26. http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?brand=ENOnline&category=News&tBrand=ENOnline&tCategory=news&itemid=NOED26%20Oct%202006%2011%3A44%3A39%3A130. 
  5. ^ "Ipswich's solo bid sparks council wars". East Anglia Daily Times. 2006-10-27. http://www.eadt.co.uk/content/eadt/news/story.aspx?brand=EADOnline&category=News&tBrand=EADOnline&tCategory=zNews&itemid=IPED26%20Oct%202006%2021%3A50%3A04%3A647. 
  6. ^ "£14 m cost' of city independence". BBC News. 2006-10-27. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/6090214.stm. 
  7. ^ "Preston and South Ribble bid for the future". Preston City Council. 2006-09-01. http://www.preston.gov.uk/News.asp?id=SX9452-A7808826. 
  8. ^ "Councils to support joint venture". BBC News. 2006-09-01. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/lancashire/5305622.stm. 
  9. ^ "Lancaster City Council welcomes Local Government White Paper". Lancaster City Council. 2006-10-26. http://www.lancaster.gov.uk/news/News.asp?id=SX7F1D-A7809355. 
  10. ^ "Councillors' snub for 'City of the Fylde' bid". Blackpool Today. 2006-11-14. http://www.blackpooltoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=62&ArticleID=1876361. 
  11. ^ "Only five may get unitary go-ahead". Local Government Chronicle. 2006-10-11. http://www.lgcnet.com/pages/news/article.asp?ArticleID=339290. 
  12. ^ "One Council for Shropshire". Shropshire County Council. 2006-11-11. http://www.shropshire.gov.uk/shropshirecc.nsf/open/6735D40672F70A7680257213003E72FB. 
  13. ^ "Councillors backing unitary body". Shropshire Star. 2006-11-18. http://www.shropshirestar.co.uk/2006/11/councillors-backing-unitary-body. 
  14. ^ "White Paper paves way for councils shake-up". The Northern Echo. 2006-10-27. http://www.thisisthenortheast.co.uk/display.var.990986.0.white_paper_paves_way_for_councils_shakeup.php. 
  15. ^ "Cumbria needs a unity of purpose". 2006-10-27. http://www.cumberland-news.co.uk/opinion/viewarticle.aspx?id=428534. 
  16. ^ "MP backs council merger idea". Times & Star. 2001-10-30. http://www.timesandstar.co.uk/news/viewarticle.aspx?id=429281. 
  17. ^ "Leader voices fears for residents with shake-up". Berwick Today. 2006-11-02. http://www.berwicktoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=970&ArticleID=1855198. 
  18. ^ "Twenty-six councils bid to become unitary authorities". 24dash.com. 2007-01-26. http://www.24dash.com/localgovernment/15788.htm. 
  19. ^ "Woolas announces sixteen successful bids for unitary status to improve local services". 2007-03-27. http://www.egovmonitor.com/node/10037. 
  20. ^ "Unitary authority plan rejected". BBC News. 2007-07-25. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/somerset/6915789.stm. Retrieved on 2007-07-29. 
  21. ^ Worst Unitary Fears Confirmed (from The Wiltshire Gazette and Herald)
  22. ^ Shrewsbury and Atcham BC and another v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; [2008] EWCA Civ 148
  23. ^ a b c Boundary Committee for England - Structural reviews
  24. ^ Chester City Council - People & Places
  25. ^ Communities and Local Government - Woolas announces sixteen successful bids for unitary status to improve local services. 27 March 2007.
  26. ^ Communities and Local Government - Healey announces nine successful unitary proposals. 25 July 2007.
  27. ^ Communities and Local Government - Green light for five flagship Unitary Councils. 5 Dec 2007.
  28. ^ Communities and Local Government - Two flagship unitary Cheshire councils to proceed. 18 Dec 2007.
  29. ^ BBC News, 25 July 2007 - County split into two authorities. Retrieval Date: 25 July, 2007.
  30. ^ Macclesfield borough council press release 25 July 2007. Retrieval Date: 25 July, 2007.
  31. ^ http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/boundary-reviews/about-structural-reviews
  32. ^ Statement from the Boundary Committee dated 9 February 2009
  33. ^ [1]
  34. ^ [2]
  35. ^ [3]
  36. ^ http://www.unitarynews.com/
  37. ^ [4]

[edit] External links

Office of Public Sector Information:

v • d • e
2009 structural changes to local government in England
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_structural_changes_to_local_government_in_England"
Personal tools
Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs